Timeline for How about a rename?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2013 at 12:12 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 6, 2010 at 3:55 | vote | accept | tshepang | ||
| Dec 6, 2010 at 3:55 | comment | added | tshepang | @ Jef Bad analogy, I agree. | |
| Dec 5, 2010 at 9:34 | answer | added | xenoterracideMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 17, 2010 at 6:51 | comment | added | Cascabel | I don't really find it arrogant, and I don't think your analogy is particularly persuasive: Linux, though unix-like, is not A Unix, while Ubuntu is absolutely a Linux [distribution]. This is not to say that the current name is perfect; I'm just not totally sure about your reasons. | |
| Nov 17, 2010 at 0:22 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 12 | |
| Nov 17, 2010 at 0:06 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @Jefromi: We've just had the Is Linux a Unix? question on the main site. | |
| Nov 16, 2010 at 23:56 | comment | added | Cascabel | Related: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2342/… | |
| Nov 16, 2010 at 23:33 | comment | added | Cascabel | It's too bad one can't google for "nix" or "unx" - I'd be curious to compare those to "unix family" and "unix-like". For what it's worth, "unix-like OS(es)" is far more common than "unix family", but unix family is probably a cleaner name for a title. | |
| Nov 16, 2010 at 22:53 | history | asked | tshepang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |