6
On U&L we frown upon cross posting and in our help center it is is explicitly mentioned. That your post has not been closed yet is just because until now nobody noticed and voted to close.
Please remove the question on this site, if someone encounters a problem similar to yours, and searches for it on google, (s)he will find the answer on Security.
...
4
From what I have seen so far, your dataset contains very few duplicates. Now, I do understand that this is something normal: your goal is to improve the algorithm, so in the beginning it's expected to have somewhat low signal-to-noise ratio. But I'm afraid you risk getting biased data because of this: if someone has to click on "NO DUPLICATES" 10 times ...
3
so–called “duplicates” are effectively killed from view from initial link - why not make that clear?
For what it's worth, I can see why you're frustrated about this. Now I notice how the site behaved, I am really weirded out by it. But I don't think that means we should undo this specific duplicate. It is a good fit for the rest of the duplicate features.
The people who write the site features don't necessarily read questions here, on Unix & Linux ...
2
The project is drawing to a close, and I am planning to take down the annotation interface this weekend.
Thank you very much to everyone who helped out, and thank you for all the valuable feedback and suggestions. Hopefully the collected annotations will lead to the development of better duplicate question detection systems, especially for StackExchange.
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
