Although it seems similar, it is a different case from this one.
My question goes on the other hand; and is that reviewing several questions about rxvt-unicode, I have found that there are times that the label indicated is
urxvt and other times
I keep in mind that
urxvt is a fork of
rxvt, so there may be the difference. However, in all the cases I am seeing they refer to
urxvt (as it is more logical that it is used today by most).
I don't know if there are cases similar to this with other ambiguous labels. But this makes dealing with the categories that reference these software a bit messy.
Wouldn't it be interesting to unify the two, perhaps in
rxvt as a generalization? What do you think?