In reviewing the queue I've noticed a lot of questions from 4 or 5 years ago being VTC'd "unclear". The odd thing about these is that a number of them have an accepted answer so clearly(!) they're not unclear.

Are others seeing this pattern, or am I just noticing normal behaviour and this is "noise" in the close pattern?

  • I haven't been in the Close review queue lately, so I can't comment on the recent queue items, but I'd call those easy "leave open" votes! Perhaps the close-voter will pipe up here and describe what they're going for; short of that, perhaps they could comment on the questions before casting the close vote to indicate why the question should be closed.
    – Jeff Schaller Mod
    Apr 1, 2019 at 0:40
  • Oh yeah, they're easy "leave open" votes. But they clutter the queue and may mean I run out of votes to use on more recent posts. Apr 1, 2019 at 0:44
  • 1
    Just in case you're concerned about it, I don't think that "Leave Open" votes use up your "close" quota. (Confirmation needed) If you think they're close-worthy, then you've put a vote to good use! If you do run out of votes, you can always re-enter the queue the next "day" to tackle what's left.
    – Jeff Schaller Mod
    Apr 1, 2019 at 0:59
  • I can't really tell without any examples, but based on my experience, sometimes questions with an accepted answer can still be unclear: if the answer is a pure guess/making assumption that incidentally matches the question's case. At the very least, try to evaluate the question without the answers and see if it's answerable without guessing.
    – Andrew T.
    Apr 1, 2019 at 12:31
  • 5
    @JeffSchaller: ‘‘Leave Open’’ doesn’t count as a vote, but it counts as a review, and we mere mortals get only 20 of them (per queue) per day. Apr 5, 2019 at 23:25
  • 1
    Excellent point, G-Man; thank you! found the reference
    – Jeff Schaller Mod
    Apr 5, 2019 at 23:32
  • I've been seeing more questions closed recently by people who I think did not understand the question. I wish there was a meta-meta so I could vote that some moderator's votes should count less. It's too easy to vote to close, and there's no penalty for being sloppy.
    – hackerb9
    Apr 13, 2019 at 8:38

1 Answer 1


I haven't paid attention recently, but on the topic of closing questions with useful answers, I'll repeat some of what I wrote on another meta question.

If you're working the close review queue, please check whether the question has good answers. If there are good answers, prioritize editing over closing, even if that means putting words in the asker's mouth. If there aren't any good answers and the question can't be saved without a drastic edit then the question should be closed.

Ideally, closure (apart from duplicates) should be a temporary state. A question should either be open or deleted. If a question is closed, it means that we aren't confident that we can provide quality answers, so we shouldn't expose those answers to the world. And a question that has no answers and no means to add one is not useful either.

So if a question has a useful answer which is on-topic for the site, but the question itself is not fit for the site, then please edit the question to match the answer. In a bit more detail:

  • If the question is off-topic then it's probably not fit for the site. Even if an off-topic question gets a good answer, this site isn't a good place for it because voters on this site can't be expected to be good judges of off-topic answers.
  • If the question is too broad or primarily opinion-based but someone managed to write a good answer, this means that the question isn't so broad and opinion-based. The question may need to be edited to be more focused or less subjective, but the proof of the pudding is in the answering. In particular, having a comprehensive answer disproves “too broad”.
  • If the question is unclear but someone managed to write a useful but perhaps partial answer, then the question should be edited to match this answer.
  • The problematic case is when there are multiple good answers that interpret the question is different ways. In this case the thread is usually not salvageable (this is why it's best to close unclear questions as quickly as possible), but it may be useful to preserve the answers by copying them to two or more new (or old) questions.

Note that accepted answer isn't synonymous with useful answer. Sometimes askers accept the first answer even if it's completely broken. And an answer can be accepted, but trivial and therefore not useful (e.g. if the question is essentially an RTFM case). Use your own judgement.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .