2

This question already has an answer here:

A cursory search of metaU&L didn't show anything, so I am going to ask freshly:

Is there a policy with questions that seem to be looking for assistance with malicious code? I understand that we are supposed to presume good faith, but when someone is asking how to obfuscate calls to os.system() with base64-encoded payloads and, when asked about it in a comment, replies (in part) "this is for command execution vulnerability", my presumption of good faith (which was admittedly weak to start with) wanes substantially.

Should such questions be flagged, ignored, or actually answered in a presumption of good faith?

marked as duplicate by DopeGhoti, Community Mar 6 '18 at 18:28

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 1
  • I was on the fence when I saw that one, too, and any remaining desire to help galloped away when they insulted you. I would ponder a downvote ("how useful is this to anyone else?") and moving on. – Jeff Schaller Mar 6 '18 at 17:54
  • Thanks very kindly for that link; it answers my question well, @JeffSchaller. And yes, I am refraining from answering it even in light of that answer for the same reason you'd moved on. – DopeGhoti Mar 6 '18 at 17:56

Browse other questions tagged .