4

This was a question asked by a new user and there was not enough details provided by the OP in the original question. So, I asked for a clarification from the user in the comment here. I did not want to discourage the new user and wanted him to show what he had tried thus far so that he could get all the help that he needs. The OP too responded here saying he will post what he tried.

Now, in the mean time, he got an answer here. This invalidates all the comments exchanged earlier and basically the OP gets what he needs without sparing much of his effort.

I want the new users to feel at ease here but at the same time want them to show some effort on their part. From the OP's perspective, this is a completely new forum to them and we do not expect the question to be perfect.

But at least can we wait till the OP responds back showing some genuine effort before starting to answer the question?

  • 1
    I agree with this, but I think there is no way to stop people from answering, they want that karma! – DisplayName Nov 21 '14 at 23:10
  • @DisplayName "they" – very funny – Hauke Laging Nov 21 '14 at 23:26
  • @HaukeLaging Lol. – DisplayName Nov 21 '14 at 23:27
  • 1
    I think the cc by-sa license is not leveraged enough in explaining to new users that they're contributing to something akin to an encyclopedic work as opposed to a forum. In a forum you have this ping pong of unrestrained feedback which people are used to. I equate twitter to that too. It's about fostering care for the assets imho. – user44370 Nov 22 '14 at 2:29
  • I am just saying as regular users can't we wait for the OP to post what he wants clearly before giving the answers to him. I just want the OP to get a feel of how the community works. For instance, the answer by @slm is the one that clearly addresses the OP's question as slm's answer is based on what the OP had tried so far. – Ramesh Nov 22 '14 at 2:34
6

There are two different issues being conflated here.

The first, as Hauke Laging notes in his answer is that, in this particular case, further clarification from the poster was not required for someone to satisfactorily answer the question. The only information still being sought was to demonstrate that the poster had made sufficient effort themselves1.

Invalidated comments are not such a big deal, they can be deleted if they end up making no sense.

The second, more substantive issue, and one that is captured by your question title is worth some consideration. Posting an answer where the question is incomplete, ie., lacking sufficient facts or details, is essentially speculative; it is a guess as to what the correct answer might be. Filling the wiki with guesses, or hedged bets designed to garner upvotes before the complete information is available is a waste of everyone's time, and should be actively discouraged.

Of the two cases, the second is clearly pernicious; the first hardly ever so. If—as a matter of policy— we were to adopt such a punitive approach to all new questioners, demanding they show their own work prior to receiving any assistance, then the tone of the community would shift, markedly, in my opinion.

My view is that it is perfectly acceptable to ask people, particularly newcomers, politely to provide some evidence of their own effort (especially if this is a homework question), but only in cases of recidivism or blatant help vampirism should answers be withheld or questions closed.

In the case of the question that you link to, my view was that it was not homework, was a decent enough question to ask here, and the subsequent edit by the questioner suggests that it was asked in good faith. Let's encourage that behaviour.

1. Note: I completely support not enabling learned helplessness...

  • 2
    Completely out of context but your language is too good and I had to actually find the meaning of some words :) But the points you made are absolutely valid and I agree. – Ramesh Nov 22 '14 at 3:57
  • 1
    @Ramesh Keeps me awake while I am typing; otherwise I manage to bore myself with my opinions... :) – jasonwryan Nov 22 '14 at 4:07
  • See the Question I Posted and Answered on 12/4 on some of this issue in order to encourage a more "standardized approach." – eyoung100 Dec 5 '14 at 16:22
  • I've occasionally seen an ambiguous question with exactly two possible interpretations that was worth answering as stated, with a good answer that covered both interpretations. Can't think of an example offhand though. :) I agree with the points you make here. – Wildcard Jan 23 '16 at 9:26
3

The answer does obviously not "invalidate" the comments. The comments did not claim that it was not possible / difficult to give useful answers – because that was not the case (in contrast to many other questions). The request for more info was about explaining the OP's mistakes to him.

Nothing prevents the OP from showing his code. He would be stupid if he didn't care just because he has a working solution.

In any case it is ridiculous to downvote an answer to indirectly educate the OP; as it is to push someone (especially a high rep user) for something that is not even a community consensus yet (as your own wording shows).

  • +1 In this particular case, further clarification from the poster was unnecessary to post an acceptable answer (as you did)... – jasonwryan Nov 22 '14 at 3:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .