Timeline for Low quality posts from high rep users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 16, 2014 at 9:01 | comment | added | jasonwryan | @Anthon: oh, I see now. His answers are only ever in there for their brevity, though. There are plenty of genuinely low quality posts to go round... | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 8:07 | comment | added | Anthon | I was exaggerating a bit by using the word 'vastly', but I have reviewed Stéphane's answers on this queue on a regular basis. (I haven't counted them but I would think at least 25). Reducing the numbers of items that pop up on the LQPRQ would diminish peoples' chances for gaining review queue related badges. | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 7:20 | comment | added | jasonwryan | @Anthon I'm not sure I follow your line of reasoning. | |
| Sep 16, 2014 at 6:54 | comment | added | Anthon | That would of course vastly reduce anyone else's chances to get the Steward badge on the LQPRQ | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 18:13 | vote | accept | jasonwryan | ||
| Aug 21, 2014 at 13:44 | history | edited | Braiam |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 21, 2014 at 13:43 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 9:57 | answer | added | slmMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 21, 2014 at 9:53 | history | asked | jasonwryan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |